Regionalisation of value creation
Nearshoring and reshoring are becoming increasingly important because lead times, geopolitical resilience and proximity to customers are now considered more important than mere labour cost advantages.
Relocation Management:
Implementing Production Relocations Safely and Cost-Effectively
When a product is relocated to another site, it involves far more than just machinery: the move also entails processes, data, supplier relationships and the expertise that has ensured successful production at the previous site. Relocating production therefore requires the transformation of the entire value chain. Relocation management manages this transition in such a way that quality and delivery reliability are consistently maintained.
The key to this lies in the strategy: Relocation management first addresses the ‘footprint’ question – that is, which site manufactures which product most cost-effectively. Where a company operates several of its own plants, this involves an intercompany assessment, i.e. a cost-benefit comparison of the group’s own sites against one another. This is combined with a ‘make-or-buy’ approach and a thorough site evaluation. The production relocation is also managed on a cross-functional basis: via engineering, supply chain, IT, sales and HR. It is precisely this consistent end-to-end view of the production footprint that successfully guides your plant relocation through to a stable ramp-up.
What is the Difference Between Relocation Management and a Production Site Move?
A simple production relocation involves physically moving machinery and plant from A to B. Relocation management, on the other hand, manages the relocation of the entire value chain: It encompasses the entire ‘transfer of work’ – that is, the quality-assured transfer of product, process and knowledge – and ensures quality, delivery capability and cost-effectiveness from the origin to the destination.
Why Offshoring is Becoming Increasingly Important
The question of the right production location is becoming a matter of renewed urgency for many companies. Several factors are at play, making the location structure a key strategic lever.
These factors have one common consequence: the demands on supply chain resilience are increasing. Relocating production should therefore not be an isolated cost-based decision, but part of an overarching strategy for optimizing the production footprint. Those who adopt such a strategy will not only gain short-term cost advantages but also long-term operational flexibility in an uncertain environment.
Typical Challenges Faced During Production Relocations
The success of a plant relocation depends above all on how the interfaces between the plants are managed and how your organization is integrated. The most common challenges can be categorized into four areas, which we address right from the start:
Inadequate data quality: bills of materials, work plans and capacity data contain gaps, and there is often a lack of transparency regarding items that are no longer active. This complicates a clean ERP data migration – and, without a cleansed database, leads to unnecessary effort when integrating the data into the new plant.
Lack of an end-to-end view: The supply chain is viewed in silos, meaning that suppliers, distribution and maintenance are only involved at a late stage, and critical paths remain unidentified.
Interface coordination: The transferring and receiving plants operate without sufficient coordination, as there is no clear project management between them via interfaces such as logistics, IT and quality.
People and organisation: Time and cost pressures may be met with internal resistance and concerns about job security. This is a factor that, without active change management, can jeopardise the entire schedule.
Customer and supplier approvals: Particularly in quality-critical sectors, products, processes or production sites must be re-qualified and approved before series production begins. If these requirements are not factored in at an early stage, additional tests, approvals and coordination loops can significantly delay the relocation.
Each of these areas also affects the cost-effectiveness of the relocation: Unresolved data gaps and organizational friction can generate additional costs that do not appear in the original business case, but only arise during the initial transition phase – that is, precisely when the old site moves into pre-production, or when the old and new sites are running in parallel and operations have not yet stabilised.
Hidden Costs and Common Risks
The initial cost estimate usually only includes visible items such as transport and commissioning. The hidden friction costs of the transition remain invisible at first, but in practice follow a recurring pattern:
These include special transport arrangements to bridge supply bottlenecks and alternative packaging during the transition phase, tooling adjustments – including ‘Made in’ labelling – as well as IT data preparation for bills of materials and work plans. Without proper planning and coordination, the outgoing plant will face excess stock and scrap costs, whilst at the new site, suppliers will need to be re-qualified.
Relocation Management
Our Five-Phase End-to-End Approach
Relocation Management: Our Five-Phase End-to-End Approach
The key to a sustainably successful relocation of production lies in a structure that identifies and actively manages risks right from the start. This is precisely what our end-to-end approach delivers: with a comprehensive view of your entire value chain, we identify hidden cost drivers as early as the concept phase – thereby ensuring that they do not arise in the first place.
As part of our relocation management service, we support your relocation through five phases, from the initial strategic feasibility analysis right through to the ramp-up of stable series production at your destination site.
-
Phase 1: Feasibility study
We carry out a strategic assessment of potential sites and integrate them into your production footprint. In doing so, we determine whether, and under what conditions, a relocation is economically viable. This provides you with a sound basis for decision-making at an early stage, and you only invest in detailed planning once the general direction has been confirmed.
-
Phase 2: Concept development
To ensure planning certainty, we translate the target vision into a robust relocation plan, including a thorough risk assessment and clear budget planning for staff and assets. This allows any future costs to be identified at an early stage. We also establish a framework that all stakeholders within your organization can use for guidance.
-
Phase 3: Detailed planning
ERP and data analysis, logistics and material flow planning as well as the timely involvement of your internal departments and supplier integration are all worked out by us right down to the operational level. Every interface and every critical path is specified in detail. In this way, we close the data gaps that typically delay a system roll-out and ensure that implementation proceeds smoothly later on without the need for reactive decision making.
-
Phase 4: Operational implementation
We coordinate transport, reconstruction, IT interfaces and communication with suppliers and customers in line with a coordinated schedule. Temporary warehouses and new distribution concepts ensure your ability to deliver remains unaffected while the old and new sites operate in parallel.
-
Phase 5: Stabilization and ramp-up
We carry out the start-up at your destination using a structured start-up management with clear stability criteria, right through to proven series production quality. The production relocation is only complete once the agreed key performance indicators are consistently achieved.
What Exactly Does "End-to-End" Mean in the Context of Relocation Management?
End-to-end means that all relevant aspects of a relocation are considered together right from the start. This includes strategic site assessment, ERP and data analysis across the supply chain, logistics and material flow planning, lead-up and ramp-up planning, supplier enablement through quality and supplier management, IT interface integration, and the actual relocation management. All these areas are interlinked: robust ramp-up planning requires a clean data foundation, whilst cost-effective budget planning takes both staff and stock levels into account in equal measure.
Relocation Management with Ingenics Consulting: Your Benefits at a Glance
For your plant relocation to be a success, it requires strategic foresight and strong operational execution. It is precisely this combination that is our strength: at Ingenics Consulting, you get both from a single source.
For you, this means one thing above all: you have a single point of contact at your side who takes full responsibility for the entire process from start to finish. There is no handover between the planning and implementation phases where knowledge is lost or responsibilities become unclear. The following benefits demonstrate how this pays off for your company:
-
A team covering everything from analysis to commissioning
The same consultants who plan your relocation also manage it operationally right down to the shop floor. We review and adjust planning assumptions directly on the production line. This not only helps us avoid unnecessary coordination loops, but also ensures a reliable timetable.
-
A coordinated plan covering all trades
We manage logistics, IT, the supply chain, quality and organization jointly and in a coordinated manner. Through sales and operations planning (S&OP), we ensure that you remain able to deliver even during the relocation: whilst the old site is being phased out and the new one is being ramped up, sufficient capacity is planned at all times to meet your customers’ needs.
-
Transparency and implementation based on partnership
Consistent transparency regarding costs, risks and critical paths builds trust at all levels. Our collaborative, practical approach actively involves your teams and keeps all stakeholders regularly informed of the current status – ensuring that they help shape and support the transition right from the start.
Whether it’s an upcoming footprint decision, a planned relocation or securing an ongoing project: the first step is a discussion. With over 45 years’ experience and teams at 24 locations worldwide, we support your relocation wherever it takes place.
Particularly when it comes to international production relocations, this means you’ll have local contacts at both sites who are familiar with the cultural and organizational conditions on the ground and who can streamline coordination processes across national borders.
Relocation Management in Context With Your Operational Strategy
Successful relocation management forms part of an overarching operations strategy that sets out the strategic framework for your value creation. As a strategic lever, it influences the cost structure, scalability and resilience of the entire network. To this end, it combines the strategic level (footprint, make-or-buy, site evaluation) with operational implementation (transport, re-establishment, supplier integration, data migration, start-up management).
Further Information about Relocation Management
Ramp-up Management
Conducts the ramp-up at the destination site to achieve stable production and takes place immediately following the completion of a relocation.
Operations Footprint
The strategic foundation of any relocation. This is where it is determined which site will fulfill which role in the network.
Make-or-Buy Strategy
Before relocating any plant, determine which value-added activities will remain at your own plant and which will be outsourced.
Operations Strategy
How to develop a viable vision for your operations based on your corporate strategy.
Digital Production & New Technologies
How digital technologies are becoming enablers of transparency, control, and effectiveness.
FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions about Relocation Management
How much time elapses between a decision being made and it being put into practice?
A realistic timeframe is 12 to 24 months between the investment decision and a stable ramp-up. Of this, three to six months are spent on the feasibility study and concept development, six to twelve months on detailed planning, including supplier, logistics and IT preparations, and a further three to six months on the actual production relocation and ramp-up. In the case of international relocations, extensive customer approvals or investments in new production capacity, projects can also take considerably longer, with timeframes of up to 36 months.
How much management attention is required during a relocation?
A production relocation is a standalone programme with a dedicated steering group at executive or divisional management level. We recommend a weekly monitoring routine throughout the entire project duration and monthly reviews with senior management. The operational project management, as well as the project teams at the transferring and receiving plants, require sufficient capacity and should therefore be largely relieved of day-to-day business responsibilities.
How can a factory relocation be carried out whilst day-to-day operations continue as normal?
The key is not to carry out the transition ‘on the side’, but to organize it as a standalone transformation project whilst consistently safeguarding the stability of day-to-day operations. We therefore recommend a phased transition rather than a ‘big bang’ approach, as well as a clear separation between line management and the project, with clearly defined responsibilities.
Can the destination plant simply take over production?
Even if facilities and processes are formally comparable, a target site cannot simply take over another site’s production. The ramp-up curve depends on factors such as experiential knowledge, well-established supplier routines or undocumented process adjustments. The situation becomes particularly critical if the practical knowledge of experienced staff is not transferred to the target site in good time. Robust ramp-up planning therefore takes into account a learning and stabilization phase and incorporates knowledge transfer mechanisms such as work shadowing, parallel dual-line operation and documented handovers.
What are the risks involved in relocating a factory?
The key risks include a loss of market share due to unstable supply capacity, delivery delays during the transition phase, quality issues at the destination site, the loss of critical expertise at the transferring plant, supplier failures requiring re-qualification, and a potential loss of customer confidence. Added to these are internal risks such as conflicts and the loss of expertise. A thorough risk assessment during the concept phase, accompanied by clear mitigation measures, is therefore standard practice in well-managed relocation projects, in order to prevent these risks from materialising.
What is the difference between ‘make-or-buy’ and offshoring?
The ‘make-or-buy’ decision determines whether a product is manufactured in-house by your company or sourced externally. It therefore affects the depth of value creation. Relocating production, on the other hand, changes the geographical distribution of in-house production – that is, which site manufactures which product.